USPTO serial 75037805
STARVISION
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 2502238Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Oct 30, 2001
- Examiner
- BELENKER, ESTHER
- Law office
- SCANNING ON DEMAND
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with STARVISION?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
STARVISION MULTIMEDIA CORPORATION
BURNABY, BRITISH COLUMBIA, CA
BURNABY, CA
STARVISION MULTIMEDIA CORPORATION
BURNABY, BRITISH COLUMBIA, CA
STARVISION SYSTEMS CORPORATION
Burnaby, British Columbia V5H 4N2, CA
BURNABY, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Sabrina C. Stavish
SABRINA C STAVISH SHERIDAN ROSS PC1700 LINCOLN ST STE 3500DENVER, CO 80203UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | Design of multimedia computer software for others, design of broadband multimedia service and communications systems for others, consultation in the field of multimedia computing and communication equipment, computer consultation in the use of multimedia computer software | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Nov 17, 1997 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by STARVISION MULTIMEDIA CORPORATION
- Other trademarks owned by CONVEDIA CORPORATION
- Other trademarks owned by STARVISION MULTIMEDIA CORPORATION
- Other trademarks owned by STARVISION SYSTEMS CORPORATION
- Other trademarks owned by CONVEDIA CORPORATION
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named STARVISION
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 2, 2008 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Jan 19, 2007 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Oct 30, 2001 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Mar 29, 2001 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Mar 12, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 8, 2001 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Nov 30, 2000 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| May 30, 2000 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Mar 7, 2000 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 4, 2000 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Dec 15, 1999 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 13, 1999 | 1.BA | Sec. 1(B) CLAIM ADDED | — |
| Dec 13, 1999 | 1.BA | Sec. 1(B) CLAIM ADDED | — |
| Dec 13, 1999 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Mar 29, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 28, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 22, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 22, 1998 | 1.BD | Sec. 1(B) CLAIM DELETED | — |
| Jun 8, 1998 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 16, 1997 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 5, 1997 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Dec 3, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 10, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 5, 1997 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 30, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 25, 1996 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 8, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 17, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |