USPTO serial 75040032
BENE FIT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 2799558Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Dec 30, 2003
- Examiner
- SHANAHAN, PATRICK
- Law office
- SCANNING ON DEMAND
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with BENE FIT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Toronto, Ontario, CA
Toronto, Ontario, CA
Toronto, Ontario, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Daniel R. Bereskin
DANIEL R BERESKIN BERESKIN & PARRBOX 401 40 KING ST W 40TH FLSCOTIA PLZTORONTO, ON M5H 3Y2Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | magnetically-encoded discount cards entitling the holder to discounts from participating providers, debit cards, credit cards, employee benefit identification cards, and security cards for providing access to place of employment, all the above of plastic | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 016 | non magnetically-encoded discount cards entitling the holder to discounts from participating providers, debit cards, credit cards, employee benefit identification cards, and security cards for providing access to place of employment, all the above of plastic | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Frontline Centre Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Frontline Centre Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Frontline Centre Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 016
- Similar marks named BENE FIT
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 1, 2014 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Jun 6, 2007 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jan 4, 2007 | PRA7 | REGISTERED - SEC. 7 REQUEST ABANDONED | — |
| Apr 28, 2006 | PRAM | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 7 | — |
| Jul 21, 2005 | AMD7 | SEC 7 REQUEST FILED | — |
| Jul 21, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 30, 2003 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Nov 14, 2003 | 1.BD | Sec. 1(B) CLAIM DELETED | — |
| Nov 13, 2003 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| Oct 7, 2003 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 7, 2003 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 6, 2003 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Apr 22, 2003 | IUCN | NOTICE OF ALLOWANCE CANCELLED | — |
| Apr 17, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 12, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 22, 2002 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jul 30, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 10, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Dec 28, 2001 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 3, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 2, 2001 | 44EA | SEC. 44(E) CLAIM ADDED | — |
| Oct 2, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 25, 2001 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 18, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 22, 2000 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 20, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 18, 2000 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| Dec 9, 1999 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 16, 1999 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 15, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 6, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 26, 1998 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 25, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 13, 1998 | ZZZY | PREVIOUS ACTION COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Jan 30, 1998 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| Feb 19, 1997 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 20, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 18, 1996 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 3, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |