USPTO serial 75041797
NUTRIMAX
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MANI, LALITHA
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with NUTRIMAX?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
James W. McKee
GREGORY A PEARSON1327 TENBY WAYPALM HARBOR, FL 34683UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | nutritional skin care and hair care products, namely skin moisturizers, skin conditioners, skin softeners, skin toners, skin tightening lotions, gels, creams and preparations, astringents for cosmetic purposes, skin cleansers, skin exfoliative preparations, and body scrubs; cuticle therapy products, namely, creams, conditioners, and removing preparations; pedicure treatments in the nature of lotions, gels, and creams; pre-sun, suntan and after sun products, namely, lotions, creams, and gels, sunscreen preparations, and sun block preparations; self tanning lotions and creams; beach refreshers, namely, mists and spritzes; hair shampoos and conditioners; hairsprays; hair detangler preparations; and, hair gels | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 11, 1998 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Mar 11, 1998 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 11, 1998 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Dec 5, 1997 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Dec 5, 1997 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Aug 12, 1997 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jul 22, 1997 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| May 29, 1997 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| May 6, 1997 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 4, 1997 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 19, 1997 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 13, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 17, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 18, 1996 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 16, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 13, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |