USPTO serial 75042526
KINGSLEY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- FROMM, MARTHA L
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with KINGSLEY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Murray Schaffer
MURRAY SCHAFFER BAUER & SCHAFFER114 OLD COUNTRY RDMINEOLA, NY 11501UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | skin soaps, perfumes, and pumice stones | ACTIVE | — |
| 008 | manicure and pedicure utensils, namely, scissors, cuticle nippers; tweezers | ACTIVE | — |
| 021 | personal care products, namely, bath brushes, toothbrushes, hair brushes, shaving brushes; scrubbing products, namely, scrubbing pads, mitts, sisal brushes and towels, loofah brushes, pads and gloves; sponges; dispensers, holders, and dishes for soaps and perfume applicators sold empty | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 3, 1999 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Aug 18, 1999 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Aug 18, 1999 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Jul 10, 1998 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Jun 12, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 12, 1998 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jan 21, 1998 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jun 12, 1997 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 26, 1996 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 14, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |