USPTO serial 75046489
CARWAY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SMITH, CHAD
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with CARWAY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Ft. Lauderdale, FL
Ft. Lauderdale, FL
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
MARK H. TIDMAN
MARK H TIDMAN BAKER & HOSTETLER LLPWASHINGTON SQ STE 1101050 CONNECTICUT AVE N WWASHINGTON, DC 20036-5304Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 012 | new and used automobile and truck parts, namely, aerodynamic fairings, air brake hoses for trucks, axles, axle bearings, axle boots, bearings, belts, brake blocks for land vehicles, brake cylinder repair kits, brake hardware, brake linings, brake pads, brakes, burglar alarms for vehicles, bumpers, chassis, car-top luggage carriers, cars, clutches, connecting rods not engine parts, fitted vehicle covers, semi fitted covers for vehicles, directional signals, drive belts, drive gears, engines, fenders, gears, glass windows for vehicles, horns hub capes, liners for the cargo areas of vehicles, rear view mirrors, side view mirrors, mud guards, pickup truck caps, rack for vehicles, structural parts for automobiles, sunshades, sunroofs, suspension systems, tires, tire chains, tire patches, tire retreading caps, tire valves, torque converters, transmissions, vehicle trim insignias, emission reduction valves, van conversions, wheel bearings, windshield sunshades and windshield wiper blades | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 10, 2001 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Aug 18, 2000 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 27, 2000 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Mar 13, 2000 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 6, 2000 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Jun 28, 1999 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 1, 1999 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jan 28, 1999 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 6, 1999 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jul 21, 1998 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 30, 1998 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jan 6, 1998 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Oct 14, 1997 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 12, 1997 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 7, 1997 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 28, 1997 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 17, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 29, 1996 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 22, 1996 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 2, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 2, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |