USPTO serial 75051463
APPLIED CHAOS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- TINGLEY, JOHN
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with APPLIED CHAOS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Ralph M. Tener
RALPH M TENER TENER & CALLAHAN, PC8330 BOONE BLVDSTE 401VIENNA, VA 22182-2624Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | computer programs for preventing damage to computer display screens by generating and displaying continually changing images; generation, processing, and display of images and patterns; signal detection, identification, and processing modeling, simulation, and medical research with respect to the brain, neuronal membranes and other neurodynamical systems; modeling, simulation, analysis, prediction, estimation, and smoothing of stochastic processes and nonlinear and dynamical systems; and user manuals provided therewith | ABANDONED | Jul 20, 1994 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 4, 1999 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Feb 4, 1999 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| May 13, 1998 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Jan 26, 1998 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jun 19, 1997 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 21, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 26, 1996 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 11, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 31, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |