Drawing for APPLIED CHAOS

USPTO serial 75051463

APPLIED CHAOS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
TINGLEY, JOHN
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with APPLIED CHAOS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Ralph M. Tener

RALPH M TENER TENER & CALLAHAN, PC8330 BOONE BLVDSTE 401VIENNA, VA 22182-2624

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009computer programs for preventing damage to computer display screens by generating and displaying continually changing images; generation, processing, and display of images and patterns; signal detection, identification, and processing modeling, simulation, and medical research with respect to the brain, neuronal membranes and other neurodynamical systems; modeling, simulation, analysis, prediction, estimation, and smoothing of stochastic processes and nonlinear and dynamical systems; and user manuals provided therewithABANDONEDJul 20, 1994

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 4, 1999ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL
Feb 4, 1999EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED
May 13, 1998CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED
Jan 26, 1998EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED
Jun 19, 1997CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Feb 21, 1997CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Aug 26, 1996CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 11, 1996DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
May 31, 1996DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance