USPTO serial 75052283
DOUBLE DIAMOND
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- May 19, 1998
- Examiner
- SHARPER JR, SAM
- Law office
- SCANNING ON DEMAND
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with DOUBLE DIAMOND?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
WEST LEAMINGTON, ONTARIO, CA
LINDEN ASSOCIATED GROWERS, INC.
Linden, CA
LINDEN ASSOCIATED GROWERS, INC.
Linden, CA
LINDEN ASSOCIATED GROWERS, INC.
Linden, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
DAVID M. PERRY
DAVID M PERRY BLANK ROME LLPONE LOGAN SQ 19TH FLPHILADELPHIA, PA 19036UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 031 | fresh fruits, excluding fresh plums; fresh vegetables | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | May 10, 1996 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by DOUBLE DIAMOND ACRES LIMITED
- Other trademarks owned by LINDEN ASSOCIATED GROWERS, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by LINDEN ASSOCIATED GROWERS, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by LINDEN ASSOCIATED GROWERS, INC.
- Other trademarks in Class 031
- Similar marks named DOUBLE DIAMOND
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 27, 2014 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Aug 17, 2007 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jun 10, 2004 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| May 3, 2004 | 815F | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) & SEC. 15 FILED | — |
| May 3, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 20, 2001 | CANT | CANCELLATION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Aug 20, 2001 | CAND | CANCELLATION DENIED NO. 999999 | — |
| May 17, 2001 | PETC | CANCELLATION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| May 19, 1998 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Sep 2, 1997 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 5, 1997 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 4, 1997 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 3, 1997 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 3, 1997 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Apr 11, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 1, 1997 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 24, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 11, 1996 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 4, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 6, 1996 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jun 24, 1996 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |