USPTO serial 75055049
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Burnaby, British Columbia, CA
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | computer software for use in accessing global interactive networks | ACTIVE | Sep 30, 1995 |
| 035 | advertising for others via on-line electronic communications networks | ACTIVE | — |
| 038 | electronic mail services; electronic transmission of data via computer terminals | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | computer services, namely, leasing access time to computer data bases in teh field of government, education and financial commerce; on-line services providing communications link with global interactive networks | ACTIVE | Sep 30, 1995 |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 15, 2000 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 3, 2000 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 11, 1999 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 2, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 29, 1998 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 21, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 18, 1997 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 31, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 5, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 6, 1996 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 2, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |