Drawing for REPROGRAMMING KIT

USPTO serial 75055823

REPROGRAMMING KIT

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
GAYNOR, BARBARA ANNE
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with REPROGRAMMING KIT?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
012automotive transmission valve body components, namely separator plates and springs; automotive transmission parts, namely separator plates and springs, sold together as a unit; automatic transmission valve body parts sold as a unit for installation in the valve bodies of vehicle automatic transmissions; and valve body kits comprising separator plates and springs for installation in the valve bodies of vehicle automatic transmissionsACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 4, 2001ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL
Oct 4, 2001EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED
May 30, 2001PRRDPETITION RECONSIDERATION REQUEST DENIED
Oct 27, 2000PILMPETITION INQUIRY LETTER ISSUED
Aug 22, 2000PRRRPETITION RECONSIDERATION REQUEST RECEIVED
Aug 2, 2000PCDEPETITION TO DIRECTOR DENIED
Jan 15, 2000PCRCPETITION TO DIRECTOR RECEIVED
Dec 16, 1999EXAREXPARTE APPEAL AFFIRMED/REVERSED IN PART
Jan 19, 1999CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED
Sep 16, 1998CNCFCONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED
Aug 25, 1998EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED
Jul 13, 1998CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Feb 10, 1998CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Nov 19, 1997DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Nov 5, 1997DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Oct 27, 1997CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
May 22, 1997CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 16, 1997CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Aug 5, 1996CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 29, 1996DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Jul 22, 1996DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance