USPTO serial 75055823
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 012 | automotive transmission valve body components, namely separator plates and springs; automotive transmission parts, namely separator plates and springs, sold together as a unit; automatic transmission valve body parts sold as a unit for installation in the valve bodies of vehicle automatic transmissions; and valve body kits comprising separator plates and springs for installation in the valve bodies of vehicle automatic transmissions | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 4, 2001 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Oct 4, 2001 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| May 30, 2001 | PRRD | PETITION RECONSIDERATION REQUEST DENIED | — |
| Oct 27, 2000 | PILM | PETITION INQUIRY LETTER ISSUED | — |
| Aug 22, 2000 | PRRR | PETITION RECONSIDERATION REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 2, 2000 | PCDE | PETITION TO DIRECTOR DENIED | — |
| Jan 15, 2000 | PCRC | PETITION TO DIRECTOR RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 16, 1999 | EXAR | EXPARTE APPEAL AFFIRMED/REVERSED IN PART | — |
| Jan 19, 1999 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Sep 16, 1998 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Aug 25, 1998 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jul 13, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 10, 1998 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 19, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 5, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 27, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 22, 1997 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 16, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 5, 1996 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 29, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 22, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |