USPTO serial 75057461
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This registration is in, or will soon enter, a USPTO maintenance window. Missing a Section 8 or Section 9 filing can cancel the registration.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
United Cable & Telephone, Inc.
Murray, UT
MURRAY, UT
United Cable & Telephone, Inc.
Murray, UT
United Cable & Telephone, Inc.
Murray, UT
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Telecommunications equipment, namely, telephone systems comprising telephones, headsets, telephone conference units, speakers, [ video cameras, cards access units, and video recorders; Private Branch Exchange, PBX, telecommunications systems, comprising, telephones, ] telephone common control processor and interface cards, [ telephone switching card cabinets, relay racks, cabinet power supplies, operating software, voice mail software, and file servers; key systems, comprising, telephones, telephone common control processor and interface cards, telephone switching card cabinets, cabinet power supplies, operating software, voice mail software and file servers; Manhole conduit systems for use with telecommunications wiring and electric wires and cables, comprising pull boxes and conduit duct; and station wiring, comprising, low voltage multi-conductor and coaxial cables rated to handle voltages of 90 VAC or less in power to support voice, data, and video communications, connectors, jack terminals, and plugs used to terminate the cables, cabinets, relay racks, faceplates, junction boxes, raceways and cable tray used to support and terminate the cables ] | ACTIVE | — |
| 037 | installation, maintenance and repair of telecommunication equipment | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 12, 2025 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 27, 2024 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Jul 26, 2019 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 23, 2016 | NA89 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - MAILED | — |
| Nov 23, 2016 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Nov 23, 2016 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Nov 23, 2016 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Sep 12, 2016 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 19, 2013 | NAS8 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 - MAILED | — |
| Feb 19, 2013 | 8.OK | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED | The USPTO accepted your Section 8 declaration showing the mark is still in use in commerce (or excusable nonuse). This satisfies the six-year maintenance requirement and keeps the registration active until the next renewal deadline. |
| Feb 19, 2013 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Feb 6, 2013 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Feb 1, 2013 | ES8R | TEAS SECTION 8 RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 12, 2006 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jun 20, 2006 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 31, 2006 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Apr 28, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 28, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 21, 2006 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 20, 2006 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Apr 19, 2006 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Apr 19, 2006 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Apr 19, 2006 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 17, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 30, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 30, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 4, 2005 | CFRC | SUBSEQUENT FINAL MAILED | — |
| Oct 4, 2005 | CFRC | SUBSEQUENT FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 30, 2005 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 23, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 23, 2005 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 23, 2005 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 22, 2005 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 2, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 7, 2004 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Aug 1, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jun 25, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 13, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 6, 1997 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 13, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 13, 1996 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 7, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |