USPTO serial 75058059
CHARLOTTE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CARMINE, F. D.
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with CHARLOTTE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Redwood Shores, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
John A. Hughes
JOHN A HUGHES TOWNSEND AND TOWNSEND AND CREW LLPTWO EMBARCADERO CTR 8TH FLSAN FRANCISCO, CA 94111-3834UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | computer programs for managment and manipulation of text for use with a global computer network, for database management, word processing, imaging functions, scannoing of documents and the manipulation of text contained therein, enabling operating platforms to communicate with each other by manipulating and managing text through an intermediate operating language, and providing a browser or search engine for text via interconnected networks, all for use in business, scientific, technical, commercial, educational and personal computing uses; and instructional manuals distributed therewith | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 24, 1999 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 21, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 30, 1997 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 10, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 7, 1997 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 6, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 3, 1996 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 21, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 12, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 8, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |