USPTO serial 75068562
SURE FIRE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 2976313Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jul 26, 2005
- Examiner
- SNAPP, TINA LOUISE
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 116
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with SURE FIRE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
TIM J. HUMPHREY
TIM J. HUMPHREY THE CLOROX COMPANY1221 BROADWAYOAKLAND, CA 94612UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 004 | Odorless charcoal lighter fluid | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Apr 1, 1996 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Kingsford Products Company, The
- Other trademarks owned by Kingsford Products Company, The
- Other trademarks owned by Kingsford Products Company, The
- Other trademarks in Class 004
- Similar marks named SURE FIRE
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 4, 2016 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Sep 14, 2010 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Sep 14, 2010 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Aug 31, 2010 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 26, 2005 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jun 14, 2005 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 10, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 6, 2005 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Jun 3, 2005 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| May 24, 2005 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| May 24, 2005 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Jan 12, 2005 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 28, 2004 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Dec 28, 2004 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Aug 26, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Aug 2, 2004 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 28, 2004 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jun 10, 2004 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Jun 10, 2004 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jun 9, 2004 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 1, 2004 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 1, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 12, 2004 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 20, 2004 | LEXT | LATE FILED EXTENSION REQUEST | — |
| Jan 20, 2004 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jan 9, 2004 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jul 2, 2003 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 2, 2003 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jul 2, 2003 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jan 21, 2003 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 9, 2003 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jan 9, 2003 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Dec 2, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 26, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 15, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 9, 2002 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| May 9, 2002 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| May 9, 2002 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Sep 17, 1997 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jul 7, 1997 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 3, 1997 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 2, 1997 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Apr 1, 1997 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 25, 1996 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 12, 1996 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 15, 1996 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 9, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |