USPTO serial 75075877
MEMORY LOCK
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MADDEN, ANNE
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with MEMORY LOCK?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
U.S. Electronics Components Corp.
Port Jefferson Station, NY
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
MAURA B LEEDS
MAURA B LEEDS MORGAN LEWIS & BOCKIUS LLP1800 M ST NWWASHINGTON, DC 20036UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | remote control units for use with electronic devices, namely, computers, computer peripherals, electronic television program guides, televisions, video accessories, namely, video cameras, video monitors, televisions for accessing a global computer information network and the World Wide Web, and video cassette recorders, television accessories, namely, boxes to access a global computer information network, television accessories, namely, boxes to access cable television, cable television converters, satellite receivers, audio equipment, namely, audio tuners, audio amplifiers, audio cassette players, stereos items, namely, tuners, receivers, radios, compact disc recorders, mini-disc recorders, digital music devices and disc players and recorders, laser disc players, digital video disc players, compact disc players, digital audio tape players recorders, phonographs, home automation equipment, namely, computer controlled lighting, temperature, and security systems, and air conditioners | ACTIVE | Nov 30, 1995 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 1, 2000 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 12, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 9, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 23, 1999 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jan 12, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 12, 1999 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jul 13, 1998 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 4, 1998 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Apr 22, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 23, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 24, 1997 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 4, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 6, 1996 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 20, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 19, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 18, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 11, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |