USPTO serial 75080695
HYPERMAIL
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- LE, MARGARET
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with HYPERMAIL?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
JEFFREY T HALEY
JEFFREY T HALEY GRAYBEAL JACKSON HALEY & JOHNSON777 108TH AVE NE STE 2460BELLEVUE, WA 98004-5117UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | personal electronic communication systems, namely, voice messaging systems comprising a telephone network connection and a computer programmed to play and record voice messages; autoattendant systems comprising a telephone network connection and a computer programmed to answer, respond to, and direct incoming calls; fax processing systems comprising a telephone network connection and a computer programmed to send and receive communications via fax; E-mail systems comprising a computer network connection and a computer programmed to send and receive electronic mail; fax back systems comprising a telephone network connection and a computer programmed to transmit faxes in response to instructions received via an incoming telephone call; data announcing systems comprising a telephone network connection and a computer programmed to announce information stored in electronic form in response to instructions received via an incoming telephone call; message reporting systems comprising a telephone network connection, a computer network connection and a computer programmed to notify an individual that they have received a voice message or electronic mail via a pager, electronic mail or telephone; video personal communication systems comprising a telephone and/or computer network connection, a video camera, a video display, and a computer programmed to send and receive video messages and carry on multi-party video conferencing; and operating software therefor | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 14, 1999 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jun 25, 1998 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 11, 1998 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jan 20, 1998 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Oct 28, 1997 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 26, 1997 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 22, 1997 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 7, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 14, 1997 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 17, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 8, 1997 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 25, 1996 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 21, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 15, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |