USPTO serial 75084048
PLAYSCAPE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- VAVONESE, DANIEL P
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with PLAYSCAPE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
ARNOLD L. BERMAN
JESS M COLLENBOX 306 SCARBOROUGH STATIONSCARBOROUGH, NY 10510-0806UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 041 | children's playground services in the nature of a supervised indoor play facility containing various play areas and/or stations for children | ABANDONED | Sep 27, 1995 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 1, 2000 | ZZZY | PREVIOUS ACTION COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Jan 13, 2000 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Jan 13, 2000 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jan 13, 2000 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jan 3, 2000 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| May 21, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 16, 1999 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Apr 16, 1999 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Dec 15, 1998 | EXFB | EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF | — |
| Mar 5, 1998 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Feb 26, 1998 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Feb 25, 1998 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jan 26, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 24, 1997 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 5, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 7, 1996 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 4, 1996 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Sep 26, 1996 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 21, 1996 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 9, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 9, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |