USPTO serial 75086377
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
MOUNTAIN VIEW, CA
ELECTRONIC CLEARING HOUSE, INC.
CAMARILLO, CA
El Paso, TX
El Paso, TX
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Sally M. Abel, Esq. and Linda G. Henry, Esq.
Sally M. Abel, Esq. and Linda G. Henry, Esq. Fenwick & West LLP801 California StreetSilicon Valley CenterMountain View, CA 94041| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 036 | providing financial information pertinent to the collection of funds via an on-line electronic database and other methods customary in the industry which are used by applicant's customers and by independent collection agencies dealing with recovery of funds from point of sales transactions | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Dec 28, 1993 |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 22, 2021 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Jan 27, 2017 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 6, 2008 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Aug 1, 2008 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 1, 2008 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 31, 2008 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Jan 31, 2008 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Jan 29, 2008 | PLGL | ASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL | — |
| Jan 25, 2008 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 22, 2008 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 5, 2008 | PR89 | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 8 & 9 | — |
| Sep 27, 2007 | UNDN | UNDELIVERABLE MAIL - NO ACTION TAKEN | — |
| Sep 12, 2007 | XXXX | POST REGISTRATION ACTION CORRECTION | — |
| Sep 6, 2007 | PLGL | ASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL | — |
| Aug 16, 2007 | 89AF | REGISTERED - COMBINED SECTION 8 (10-YR) & SEC. 9 FILED | — |
| Aug 16, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 18, 2007 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Sep 7, 2004 | FAXX | FAX SENT | — |
| Mar 26, 2004 | 8.OK | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED | The USPTO accepted your Section 8 declaration showing the mark is still in use in commerce (or excusable nonuse). This satisfies the six-year maintenance requirement and keeps the registration active until the next renewal deadline. |
| May 23, 2003 | 815F | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) & SEC. 15 FILED | — |
| May 23, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 27, 1998 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Nov 25, 1997 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 20, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 9, 1997 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 24, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 25, 1996 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 18, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |