USPTO serial 75088606
LAPIS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 2457497Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jun 5, 2001
- Examiner
- CHARLON, BARNEY
- Law office
- SCANNING ON DEMAND
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with LAPIS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
9422 Staad, CH
9422 Staad, CH
9422 Staad, CH
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
JULIE A. KATZ
JULIE A KATZ WELSH & KATZ, LTD120 S RIVERSIDE PLZ FL 22CHICAGO, IL 60606-3913UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 005 | diagnostic reagents for clinical medical laboratory use in the fields of microbiology, molecular biology, and clinical diagnostics | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Mar 25, 1993 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 8, 2008 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Oct 20, 2006 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jun 5, 2001 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Dec 21, 2000 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Dec 20, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 2, 2000 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 26, 2000 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Sep 26, 2000 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Aug 31, 2000 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Apr 28, 2000 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 2, 2000 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Oct 15, 1999 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 2, 1999 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Mar 2, 1999 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Dec 8, 1998 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 6, 1998 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Oct 6, 1998 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 17, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 20, 1998 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Apr 20, 1998 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Jan 5, 1998 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 6, 1997 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 10, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 25, 1997 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 2, 1996 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 15, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |