USPTO serial 75096904
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
MARTHA P. SIEGEL
MARTHA P SIEGEL MORRISON & FOERSTER, LLP425 MARKET STSAN FRANCISCO, CA 94105UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 016 | catalogs for computer-related products, namely, hardware, software, peripherals, accessories, supplies, books and instructional materials | ACTIVE | — |
| 035 | Disseminating advertising for others and promoting the goods and services of others through the distribution of printed publications and via on-line telecommunications networks | ACTIVE | — |
| 037 | installation, maintenance and repair of computers, computer peripherals and installation of computer software | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | telephone-order services, mail-order services, retail-store services, electronic retailing services, and operating an on-line information service, all in the field of computer-related products, namely, computer hardware, software, peripherals, accessories, supplies, books and instructional materials; maintenance of computer software | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 4, 2002 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 27, 2001 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 13, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 12, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 18, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 10, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 29, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 1, 1998 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 23, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 23, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 20, 1997 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 21, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 25, 1996 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 1, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 23, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 23, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |