USPTO serial 75100173
SECURELINK
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- KIM, RICHARD
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with SECURELINK?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
JENNIFER A ALBERT
JENNIFER A ALBERT ARENT FOX KINTNER PLOTKIN & KAHN PLLC1050 CONNECTICUT AVE NWWASHINGTON, DC 20036-5339UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | customer premise telecommunications equipment sold directly to financial institutions for transmitting and receiving data over an integrated services digital network, namely, for interconnecting credit/debit card readers used by retail establishments and automated transactional machines to financial institution systems to process data applications such as electronic data transaction processing, file transfers and remote site polling used for point of sale transactions, credit/debit credit card processing, and automated teller machine networks, but not for use in conjunction with interconnection of computers and computer networks | ACTIVE | Mar 26, 1996 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 18, 1999 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Aug 18, 1999 | EXFB | EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF | — |
| Jun 21, 1999 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Feb 25, 1999 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Feb 24, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 5, 1998 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Sep 11, 1998 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Sep 9, 1998 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Aug 7, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 12, 1998 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 2, 1997 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 14, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 6, 1996 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 20, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 12, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |