Drawing for DECISION FOCUS INCORPORATED

USPTO serial 75102811

DECISION FOCUS INCORPORATED

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
LORENZO, GEORGE M
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 604: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with DECISION FOCUS INCORPORATED?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

G E MARSHALL

KURT H TAYLOR WILSON MARSHALL & TAYLOR PC2465 E BAYSHORE RDSTE 402PALO ALTO, CA 94303-3205

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
042design and development for others of custom computer software information systems for business strategy, management, marketing and operationsABANDONEDJan 15, 1984

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 24, 1998ABN4ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION
Apr 24, 1998OP.TOPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999
Apr 24, 1998OP.SOPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999
Nov 17, 1997OP.IOPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999
Oct 9, 1997ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED
Sep 16, 1997PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Aug 15, 1997NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Jul 6, 1997CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Jun 10, 1997CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Dec 31, 1996CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 16, 1996DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Dec 2, 1996DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance