USPTO serial 75116172
BIOPIL
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CLARKE, ERNESTO
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with BIOPIL?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
MAGIC DREAMS COSMETICA INFANTIL, S.A.
28940 Fuenlabrada, Madrid, ES
Other trademarks owned by MAGIC DREAMS COSMETICA INFANTIL, S.A.
MAGIC DREAMS COSMETICA INFANTIL, S.A.
28940 Fuenlabrada, Madrid, ES
Other trademarks owned by MAGIC DREAMS COSMETICA INFANTIL, S.A.
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Mary Frances Love
MARY FRANCES LOVE WIGMAN COHEN LEITNER & MYERS PC900 17TH ST NW STE 1000WASHINGTON, DC 20006UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | depilatory wax, namely, wax for body and facial hair removal, cloth strips treated with wax for depilation, lotions and creams for depilation; cosmetics, namely, moisture milks, after-depilation gels, antiseptic lotions, cleansing milks, cleansing oils, soothing lotions, hair color removers, perfume, colognes, essential oils for personal use, body lotions, mascara, lipsticks; non-medical sun products, namely, suntan lotions and suntanning preparations, products for hair-treatment, namely, shampoo, conditioners and hair-tinting treatments | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 3, 1999 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 11, 1998 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 4, 1998 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| May 12, 1998 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Feb 17, 1998 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 17, 1998 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 16, 1998 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Dec 15, 1997 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 5, 1997 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jul 2, 1997 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 14, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 14, 1996 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 12, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |