Drawing for NTMANAGE

USPTO serial 75124930

NTMANAGE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
TINGLEY, JOHN
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 604: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with NTMANAGE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

KENT A. ROWALD

KENT A ROWALD VADEN, EICKENROHT & THOMPSON, LLPONE RIVERWAYSTE 1100HOUSTON, TX 77056-1982

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009computer software for use in monitoring and managing an unlimited number of servers, workstations, and network devices and servicesACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 27, 2000OP.TOPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999
Apr 27, 2000OP.DOPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999
Dec 10, 1999OP.TOPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999
Dec 10, 1999OP.SOPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999
Nov 8, 1999OP.TOPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999
Nov 4, 1999ABN4ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION
Nov 4, 1999OP.DOPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999
Aug 6, 1999OP.TOPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999
Aug 6, 1999OP.DOPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999
Aug 18, 1998OP.IOPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999
Aug 7, 1998OP.IOPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999
Jul 22, 1998OP.IOPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999
Feb 23, 1998ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED
Feb 3, 1998PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jan 3, 1998NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Aug 5, 1997CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Jul 19, 1997ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN
Jul 15, 1997CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Jun 9, 1997CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Apr 21, 1997CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 7, 1997DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance