USPTO serial 75126357
THE INTENSITY MODULATION COMPANY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 2633411Status 711
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Oct 8, 2002
- Examiner
- JENKINS JR, CHARLES L
- Law office
- POST REGISTRATION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with THE INTENSITY MODULATION COMPANY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 010 | radiation therapy medical equipment, namely multi-leaf collimators; immobilization systems comprised of patient securing platforms, inion bags and adapters; target systems comprised of frames, targeting plates, radiopaque markers, target circles, and cross-hair lines, and verification cassettes for confirming radiation therapy treatment plans; systems comprised of skull screws and adjustable blocks for stereostactic fixation and positioning; couch stabilization and index systems comprised of a vertical column supporting two arms equipped with an electronic digital scale | SECTION 7(e) - CANCELLED | Aug 30, 1996 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by BEST MEDICAL INTERNATIONAL, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by NOMOS Corporation
- Other trademarks owned by NOMOS Corporation
- Other trademarks in Class 010
- Similar marks named THE INTENSITY MODULATION COMPANY
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 29, 2017 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Jan 30, 2012 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 24, 2008 | C7.. | CANCELLED SECTION 7-TOTAL | — |
| Oct 15, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 8, 2008 | C7RF | REQUEST FOR SECT 7 TOTAL SURRENDER FILED | — |
| Oct 8, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 30, 2008 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Nov 7, 2007 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Sep 25, 2007 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 25, 2007 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 8, 2002 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Jul 3, 2002 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 3, 2002 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Jun 10, 2002 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| Nov 27, 2001 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 24, 2001 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 10, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 8, 2000 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jul 13, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 13, 2000 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jan 10, 2000 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 9, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 8, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 30, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 25, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 24, 1996 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 22, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |