USPTO serial 75127620
EL MEXICANO
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SHARPER JR, SAM
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with EL MEXICANO?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Marquez Brothers Mexican Imports, Inc.
San Jose, CA
Other trademarks owned by Marquez Brothers Mexican Imports, Inc.
MARQUEZ BROTHERS INTERNATIONAL, INC.
SAN JOSE, CA
Other trademarks owned by MARQUEZ BROTHERS INTERNATIONAL, INC.
Marquez Brothers Mexican Imports, Inc.
San Jose, CA
Other trademarks owned by Marquez Brothers Mexican Imports, Inc.
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 033 | hard cider, distilled spirits, sangria, tequila, prepared alcoholic cocktail, distilled liquor, alcoholic punch, wine, wine coolers, wine punches | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Marquez Brothers Mexican Imports, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by MARQUEZ BROTHERS INTERNATIONAL, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by Marquez Brothers Mexican Imports, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 033
- Similar marks named EL MEXICANO
- Prosecution event ABN6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 11, 2004 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jun 30, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Apr 1, 2004 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 29, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 25, 2003 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Jul 17, 2003 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 27, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 25, 2003 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Apr 12, 2003 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 26, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 23, 2002 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Aug 5, 2002 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 29, 2002 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jul 1, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 26, 2002 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jun 26, 2002 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 1, 2002 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 4, 2002 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 26, 2001 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jun 26, 2001 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| May 11, 2001 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| May 11, 2001 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 13, 2001 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jan 20, 2000 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 21, 1999 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 19, 1999 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Oct 4, 1999 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 1, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 16, 1998 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 8, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 6, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 3, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 31, 1997 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 30, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 6, 1997 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |