Drawing for VIRTUALGRAFT

USPTO serial 75128214

VIRTUALGRAFT

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
MERMELSTEIN, DAVID
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with VIRTUALGRAFT?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Mark J. Pandiscio

MARK J PANDISCIO PANDISCIO & PANDISCIO470 TOTTEN POND RDWALTHAM, MA 02154UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009pre-recorded computer software and data sets for use with medical imaging and data visualization systemsABANDONED
042preparing computer data sets for others in the field of medical imaging and data visualization, and providing on-line technical services in the field of medical imaging and data visualizationABANDONED

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 20, 1999EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED
May 20, 1999EXDMEXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED AS MOOT
Apr 9, 1999ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL
Feb 4, 1999CNCFCONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED
Aug 28, 1998EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED
Feb 11, 1998CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jan 26, 1998CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Jul 21, 1997CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 16, 1997CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Dec 16, 1996CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 6, 1996DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance