USPTO serial 75129041
NANOSCREEN
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- LORENZO, ROBERT
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with NANOSCREEN?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
SAN DIEGO, CA
PACKARD INSTRUMENT COMPANY, INC.
DOWNERS GROVE, IL
PACKARD INSTRUMENT COMPANY, INC.
DOWNERS GROVE, IL
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | laboratory equipment, namely, micro plates | ACTIVE | Mar 16, 1999 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by AURORA BIOSCIENCES CORP.
- Other trademarks owned by PACKARD INSTRUMENT COMPANY, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by PACKARD INSTRUMENT COMPANY, INC.
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Similar marks named NANOSCREEN
- Prosecution event ABN2 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 4, 2000 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 4, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 9, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 25, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 2, 2000 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jan 2, 2000 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 12, 1999 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Nov 12, 1999 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Jun 17, 1999 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| May 13, 1999 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Dec 8, 1998 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 13, 1998 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| May 12, 1998 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| May 12, 1998 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Dec 9, 1997 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 3, 1997 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| May 13, 1997 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Feb 18, 1997 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 17, 1997 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Dec 20, 1996 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 18, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |