USPTO serial 75129115
QUESTAR
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- ZAK, HENRY
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with QUESTAR?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
MYRON E SIEGEL
MYRON E SIEGEL MYRON E SIEGEL & ASSOCIATES LTD2275 HALF DAY RD STE 350BANNOCKBURN, IL 60015UNITED STATESGoods and services
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 22, 2001 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Jan 22, 2001 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jan 22, 2001 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Dec 17, 1997 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Dec 8, 1997 | OPPF | OPPOSITION PAPERS RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Nov 11, 1997 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 10, 1997 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 15, 1997 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Sep 9, 1997 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 8, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 4, 1997 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Mar 18, 1997 | CNRU | DISAPPROVAL - AMENDMENT TO USE MAILED | — |
| Mar 5, 1997 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Feb 11, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 11, 1997 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Oct 31, 1996 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 30, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |