Drawing for SEALTITE

USPTO serial 75129229

SEALTITE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
OH, WON TEAK
Law office
TTAB

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 604: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with SEALTITE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Walter D. Ames

6718 Wemberly WayMcLean, VA 22101-1530UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
006self-piercing and self-drilling metal screws for use in the manufacture of metal and post-frame buildingsABANDONED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 20, 2007MAB4ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION—
Nov 20, 2007ABN4ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION—
Aug 28, 2007OP.SOPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999—
Mar 20, 2003OP.IOPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999—
Dec 18, 2002ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
Nov 5, 2002PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Oct 16, 2002NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Aug 29, 2002CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Feb 1, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 3, 2001CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jul 23, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 14, 2001CNSIINQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED—
Sep 7, 2000CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Jul 6, 2000CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 9, 2000CNSIINQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED—
Dec 23, 1999CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Sep 13, 1999CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 8, 1999CNSIINQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED—
Mar 5, 1999CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Jan 20, 1999CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 12, 1999CNSIINQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED—
Jun 11, 1998CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Apr 28, 1998CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 31, 1998CNSIINQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED—
Jul 25, 1997CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Jun 5, 1997CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 21, 1997CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Apr 14, 1997CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 24, 1996CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 5, 1996DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance