USPTO serial 75129665
CHRYSALIS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- RICHARD, JENNIFER
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with CHRYSALIS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Calvin P. Griffith
PAUL J KENNEDY ETSPEPPER HAMILTON, LLP3000 TWO LOGAN SQ 18TH AND ARCH STPHILADELPHIA, PA 19103-2799Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | research, development and testing for products for others; laboratory research, and clinical and preclinical testing, for others in the field of biotechnology and pharmaceuticals, healthcare devices, chemicals, and agricultural products | ABANDONED | Dec 19, 1996 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 1, 2003 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Apr 1, 2003 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Apr 1, 2003 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Feb 10, 1999 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Aug 5, 1997 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 4, 1997 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 27, 1997 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 30, 1997 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Apr 21, 1997 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Apr 10, 1997 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 24, 1997 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Mar 20, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 21, 1997 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 15, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |