Drawing for ONSITE COMPUTING

USPTO serial 75129913

ONSITE COMPUTING

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
SMIGA, HOWARD
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ONSITE COMPUTING?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

CHRISTOPHER D. KEIRS

CHRISTOPHER D KEIRS DIGITAL EQUIPMENT CORPP O BOX 692000HOUSTON, TX 77269-2000UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009computer hardware; computer application software for use with local area, wide area and/or global computer communications networks, namely, searching for, compiling, indexing, and organizing information, providing security for communications, electronic mail, and facilitating workgroup communicationsACTIVE
042computer services, including a directory on the World Wide Web that organizes and indexes widespread web sites, news groups and other resources into easy-to-find topic areas permitting customers to access them, and provision of demographic informationACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 20, 2000ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED
Aug 25, 2000CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Aug 1, 2000CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Apr 19, 1999CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Oct 13, 1998CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 15, 1997CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED
Sep 5, 1997CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Mar 25, 1997CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 10, 1997CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 28, 1997DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance