USPTO serial 75129989
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Vancouver, British Columbia V6B-3H7, CA
Vancouver, British Columbia V6B-3H7, CA
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Val D. Hornstein
DINESH AGARWAL LAW OFFICE OF DINESH AGARWAL5350 SHAWNEE RD STE 330ALEXANDRIA, VA 22312UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | computer hardware, namely, a gesture recognition interface for controlling the function of various electronic products and appliances; computer software for operating this hardware and associated documentation and manuals sold therewith | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 28, 2000 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Apr 8, 1999 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 12, 1999 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Sep 30, 1998 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 8, 1998 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| May 15, 1998 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 22, 1998 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Nov 4, 1997 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Aug 12, 1997 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 11, 1997 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 27, 1997 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 19, 1997 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Mar 14, 1997 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 28, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |