USPTO serial 75136600
ONQ
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- VANSTON, KATHY
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with ONQ?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
San Francisco, CA
San Francisco, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Carla B. Oakley
THOMAS M ONDA STEINHART & FALCONER LLP333 MARKET ST STE 3200SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94105-2150UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | providing multiple use access to a global computer information network for the transfer and dissemination of a wide range of general interest information | ABANDONED | Aug 25, 1996 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 18, 1998 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Dec 18, 1998 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Dec 18, 1998 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Sep 30, 1997 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| May 23, 1997 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| May 6, 1997 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 4, 1997 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 10, 1997 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 25, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 19, 1996 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 18, 1996 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Dec 18, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 3, 1996 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Oct 16, 1996 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 16, 1996 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Oct 16, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |