USPTO serial 75136691
SAILA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jul 20, 1999
- Examiner
- KUHLKE, KAREN
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with SAILA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
TORONTO, ONTARIO M6J 3L9, CA
20020 Lainate (MI) Milano, IT
20020 Lainate (MI) Milano, IT
20020 Lainate (MI) Milano, IT
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Daniel Chung, Esq.
DANIEL CHUNG ESQ CADBURY SCHWEPPES900 KING STRYE BROOK, NY 10573UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 030 | pastilles and confections, namely, candy, containing low or no calorie sweeteners and various flavors | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by CADBURY ADAMS CANADA INC.
- Other trademarks owned by Warner Lambert Canada, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Warner Lambert Canada, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Warner Lambert Canada, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 030
- Similar marks named SAILA
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 22, 2006 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Feb 17, 2005 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 17, 2005 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 14, 2004 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 15, 2004 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 16, 2000 | PINT | REPRINTING REGISTRATION CERTIFICATE | — |
| Jul 14, 2000 | AMD7 | SEC 7 REQUEST FILED | — |
| Jul 20, 1999 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Apr 27, 1999 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 26, 1999 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 9, 1999 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 16, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 10, 1998 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 2, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 26, 1998 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| Jan 28, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 5, 1998 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 5, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 24, 1997 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 19, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |