USPTO serial 75136806
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Topanga Canyon, CA
WOODLAND HILLS, CA
WOODLAND HILLS, CA
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Peter M. Eichler
CLYDE M. HETTRICK HETTRICKLAW, P.C.1801 CENTURY PARK EAST, 24TH FLOORLOS ANGELES, CA 90067UNITED STATESCopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 19, 2011 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Feb 4, 2010 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jul 15, 2009 | CAND | CANCELLATION DENIED NO. 999999 | — |
| Dec 10, 2008 | CANT | CANCELLATION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Dec 10, 2008 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| Feb 7, 2007 | C18. | CANCELLED SECTION 18-TOTAL | — |
| Feb 7, 2007 | CANT | CANCELLATION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jan 29, 2007 | CANG | CANCELLATION GRANTED NO. 999999 | — |
| May 12, 2006 | PETC | CANCELLATION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Sep 21, 2004 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jul 20, 2004 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jul 20, 2004 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jul 12, 2004 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jun 29, 2004 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jun 29, 2004 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jun 29, 2004 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 26, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 15, 2002 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Sep 16, 2002 | OPPF | OPPOSITION PAPERS RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Aug 6, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 17, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Dec 1, 2000 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 22, 2000 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Oct 26, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 29, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 23, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 14, 1999 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| Jul 22, 1999 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| May 23, 1999 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 23, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 3, 1998 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 1, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 17, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 26, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 26, 1997 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 17, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 22, 1997 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 10, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |