USPTO serial 75137097
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Oakbrook Terrace, IL
Oakbrook Terrace, IL
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Martin R. Greenstein
MARTIN R GREENSTEIN TECHMARK55 S MARKET ST SIXTEENTH FLSAN JOSE, CA 95113UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | computer software for use in database access, navigation, implementation, administration, conversion, migration and management; computer software for database query and reporting; computer software for client/server and remote computing applications; computer software utilities; computer software containing database system tools; computer software providing access to global computer networks and wide area networks; computer software for systems management; and instruction manuals sold as a unit | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 16, 2001 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jul 4, 2000 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Apr 11, 2000 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 10, 2000 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 10, 2000 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 29, 1999 | EXPR | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL REVERSED | — |
| Mar 1, 1999 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Jan 28, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 5, 1998 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Apr 2, 1998 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Feb 9, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 7, 1997 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 15, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 16, 1997 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 13, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |