Drawing for REALTIMEXTRACT

USPTO serial 75137097

REALTIMEXTRACT

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
VANSTON, KATHY
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with REALTIMEXTRACT?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Martin R. Greenstein

MARTIN R GREENSTEIN TECHMARK55 S MARKET ST SIXTEENTH FLSAN JOSE, CA 95113UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009computer software for use in database access, navigation, implementation, administration, conversion, migration and management; computer software for database query and reporting; computer software for client/server and remote computing applications; computer software utilities; computer software containing database system tools; computer software providing access to global computer networks and wide area networks; computer software for systems management; and instruction manuals sold as a unitACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ABN6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 16, 2001ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jul 4, 2000NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Apr 11, 2000PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Mar 10, 2000NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Jan 10, 2000CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Nov 29, 1999EXPREX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL REVERSED
Mar 1, 1999CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED
Jan 28, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
May 5, 1998CNCFCONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED
Apr 2, 1998JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY
Feb 9, 1998CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Aug 7, 1997CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jul 15, 1997CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Jan 16, 1997CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 13, 1997DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance