USPTO serial 75137505
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
ROCHELLE D ALPERT
ROCHELLE D ALPERT MORRISON & FOERSTER LLP425 MARKET STSAN FRANCISCO, CA 94105-2482UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | clothing, namely, headwear; footwear; neckwear; children's and baby's clothing, namely, T-shirts, shorts, rompers, bike pants and leggings, pants and jeans, dresses, cloth bibs, overalls, shirts and blouses, knit shirts and other tops, skirts, sweatshirts, tracksuits, underwear, jackets, body suits and dresses, sleepwear, swimwear, footwear, socks; maternity clothing, namely, maternity dresses, bodysuits, jackets, knit shirts and other tops, skirts, sweatshirts, tracksuits, underwear, jackets, body suits and dresses, sleepwear, swimwear, footwear, socks; outerwear, namely, jackets; and underwear | ABANDONED | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 19, 2000 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 17, 2000 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| May 10, 2000 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 14, 2000 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Oct 22, 1999 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 17, 1999 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| Sep 17, 1999 | PCGR | PETITION TO DIRECTOR GRANTED | — |
| Sep 15, 1999 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| May 5, 1999 | PCRC | PETITION TO DIRECTOR RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 7, 1999 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Apr 7, 1999 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Apr 5, 1999 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 16, 1999 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Oct 6, 1998 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 16, 1998 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Mar 17, 1998 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Dec 23, 1997 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 21, 1997 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Oct 25, 1997 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 20, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 21, 1997 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 18, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 23, 1996 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 17, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |