USPTO serial 75138138
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Fulham, London SW6, GB
Fulham, London SW6, GB
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
STANLEY M. ERJAVAC
STANLEY M ERJAVAC HARNESS, DICKEY & PIERCE, PLCP O BOX 828BLOOMFIELD HILLS, MI 48303UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | unprocessed plastics in the nature of filtering materials and polymers for use in manufacturing chemical mixing sachets, detergent sachets, cotton wool bud sticks, laundry bags, fishing bait bags, diapers, feminine hygiene products, hospital gloves and gowns, refuse sacks, carrier bags, pallet wrap, disposable gloves, agricultural films, seedling trays, beverage can holders, bottle labels, semiconductor packaging, disposable plates, cups, cutlery, loose fill packaging, molded packaging, heat insulation material, seat cushions, cigarette filters, and fire retardant materials; and adhesives for general bonding and repair purposes | ACTIVE | Oct 2, 2000 |
| 002 | liquid protective coatings in the nature of paint for use on cutlery, fine bone china, household fittings, garden furniture, glass and plastic bottles, motor vehicle paints, jewelry, ceramic, stainless steel, brass, chrome, medical instruments, gold plated items, silverware, optical lenses, surfaces from which rust or other corrosion has been removed, glass and mirror surfaces, alloy wheel surfaces, cardboard packaging laminates, beverage can surfaces, bank note laminates and tamper-proof seals | ACTIVE | Oct 2, 2000 |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 27, 2003 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 7, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 10, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 7, 2002 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Jun 20, 2002 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Feb 20, 2002 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Oct 19, 2001 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Apr 20, 2001 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 20, 2001 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Oct 20, 2000 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 20, 2000 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Jun 12, 2000 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 18, 2000 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Dec 10, 1999 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 18, 1999 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| May 11, 1999 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 19, 1999 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Oct 20, 1998 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jul 28, 1998 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 26, 1998 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 22, 1998 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 13, 1998 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Mar 3, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 26, 1997 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 7, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 2, 1997 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 27, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |