Drawing for NEWPORT

USPTO serial 75138378

NEWPORT

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 2203466Status 900
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Nov 17, 1998
Examiner
MAYERSCHOFF, GLENN
Law office
POST REGISTRATION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with NEWPORT?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Nicole M. Meyer

Nicole M. Meyer Dickinson Wright PLLCSuite 12001875 Eye Street, N.W.Washington, DC 20006

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
007mechanically operated hand-held or machine-held tools, namely, mechanically operated hand-held wire crimpers, mechanically operated hand-held wire strippers, machine-held wire strippers; pumps, namely, centrifugal pumps, chemical dosing pumps, diaphragm type injector motor pumps, hand-held dispensing pumps, drum pumps, fluid pumps, gear pumps, hand-operated pumps, rubber impeller pumps, peristaltic pumps, hand-held portable transfer pumps, vacuum pumps; and parts and fittings thereforEXPIRED
009metering pumps, namely, microprocessor based chemical metering pumps, chemical metering pumps, diaphragm metering pumps, electronic metering pumps, large capacity metering pumps, and low flow metering pumps and parts and fittings thereforEXPIRED

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 15, 2020CAEXCANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9
Nov 17, 2017REM2COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED
Aug 20, 2014ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP
Feb 5, 2009RNL1REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS)The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active.
Feb 5, 200989AGREGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTEDThe USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary.
Nov 20, 2008PLGLASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL
Nov 14, 2008E89RTEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED
Nov 6, 2008TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED
Aug 1, 2007CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS
May 23, 2007TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED
Jan 31, 2005C15AREGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK.
Nov 16, 2004815FREGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) & SEC. 15 FILED
Nov 16, 2004E815TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED
Nov 17, 1998R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Apr 13, 1998ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED
Mar 10, 1998PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Feb 7, 1998NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Jan 9, 1998CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Nov 24, 1997CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
May 23, 1997CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 7, 1997CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Jan 7, 1997CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 31, 1996DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Dec 24, 1996DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Dec 20, 1996DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance