Drawing for OPEN REALITY LABS

USPTO serial 75138404

OPEN REALITY LABS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
MCNUTT, GEOFF
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with OPEN REALITY LABS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Robert B. G. Horowitz

Robert B. G. Horowitz Baker & Hostetler LLP45 Rockefeller PlazaNew York, NY 10111UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009computer peripheral mouse pads and decorative magnetsABANDONED
016pens, pencils, stationery, notepads, paper napkins, notebook covers, writing paper, wrapping paper, boxes and newsletters for game players about gamesABANDONED
020non-metal keychains and plastic keychainsABANDONED
021paper cups, paper plates, ceramic mugs and beverage glasswareABANDONED
025hats, caps, visors, T-shirts, sweatshirts and jacketsABANDONED
041entertainment services, namely, amusement arcades featuring interactive multiple player computer gamesABANDONED
042design and testing of new products for others, namely, providing a test site for computer game software by featuring it in an amusement arcadeABANDONED

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ARAA): This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 19, 2008ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 19, 2008REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED
May 17, 1999ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Sep 22, 1998NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jun 30, 1998PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
May 29, 1998NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Apr 19, 1998CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Mar 9, 1998CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Sep 5, 1997CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jul 14, 1997CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Jan 9, 1997CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 24, 1996DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Dec 24, 1996DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance