USPTO serial 75138558
WEEKEND PROVISIONS WOMAN
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- LEE, DOUGLAS
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with WEEKEND PROVISIONS WOMAN?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Parker H. Bagley
PARKER H BAGLEY BAKER & BOTTS LLP30 ROCKEFELLER PLZNEW YORK, NY 10112-0228UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | women's clothing | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 17, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 6, 2000 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Aug 1, 2000 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Aug 1, 2000 | EXFB | EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF | — |
| Mar 29, 2000 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Mar 13, 2000 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Mar 13, 2000 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Aug 10, 1999 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 29, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 8, 1999 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| May 12, 1999 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Apr 12, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 18, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 18, 1999 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jan 13, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 11, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 30, 1997 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 10, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 8, 1997 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 19, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 21, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 19, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |