Drawing for MANGO KETCHUP

USPTO serial 75139139

MANGO KETCHUP

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
FRIEDMAN, HOWARD
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with MANGO KETCHUP?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

William E. Levin

WILLIAM E LEVIN LEVIN & GLUCK384 FOREST AVE STE 13LAGUNA BEACH, CA 92651UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
030non-tomato based condiments, namely, seasoning for use on any dishACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 25, 2001JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY
Jul 25, 2001EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED
Feb 23, 2001EXFBEXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF
Apr 20, 1999ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL
Feb 1, 1999CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Dec 9, 1998CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Nov 5, 1998JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY
Oct 29, 1998CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 30, 1998JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY
Sep 29, 1998EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED
Jun 4, 1998CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Jun 1, 1998DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Dec 4, 1997CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Nov 10, 1997DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Oct 15, 1997DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Aug 26, 1997CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Feb 27, 1997CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 3, 1997DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance