USPTO serial 75139306
CANADIAN PACIFIC HOTELS SINCE 1886
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Sep 2, 2003
- Examiner
- POWERS, ALEXANDER L
- Law office
- SCANNING ON DEMAND
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with CANADIAN PACIFIC HOTELS SINCE 1886?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
CANADIAN PACIFIC RAILWAY COMPANY
TORONTO, CA
CALGARY, ALBERT, CA
CANADIAN PACIFIC RAILWAY COMPANY
TORONTO, CA
Toronto, CA
CANADIAN PACIFIC RAILWAY COMPANY
TORONTO, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
John L. Beard
JOHN L BEARD MERCHANT & GOULD PCP O BOX 2910MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55402-0910UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | hotel services | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by CANADIAN PACIFIC RAILWAY COMPANY
- Other trademarks owned by CANADIAN PACIFIC LIMITED
- Other trademarks owned by CANADIAN PACIFIC RAILWAY COMPANY
- Other trademarks owned by CANADIAN PACIFIC LIMITED
- Other trademarks owned by CANADIAN PACIFIC RAILWAY COMPANY
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named CANADIAN PACIFIC HOTELS SINCE 1886
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 10, 2010 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Sep 12, 2007 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Jul 9, 2007 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Sep 2, 2003 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jul 18, 2003 | 1.BD | Sec. 1(B) CLAIM DELETED | — |
| Jun 10, 2003 | IUCN | NOTICE OF ALLOWANCE CANCELLED | — |
| May 19, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 10, 2002 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Sep 17, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 28, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 24, 2002 | 44DD | SEC. 44(D) CLAIM DELETED | — |
| Jun 17, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 10, 2002 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Nov 26, 2001 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 21, 2001 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 26, 2001 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 8, 2000 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 27, 1999 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 25, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 13, 1999 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 6, 1998 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 6, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 8, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 3, 1997 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 4, 1997 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 23, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 10, 1997 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 9, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 2, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |