USPTO serial 75139685
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Lisa M. DuRoss
LISA M DUROSS WEINTRAUB, DUROSS & BRADY30200 TELEGRAPH RD STE 444BINGHAM FARMS, MI 48025-4505UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | waterproofing chemical compositions for articles of fabric, leather and suede | ABANDONED | Jan 1, 1997 |
| 002 | domestic, industrial and commercial interior and exterior paint, varnish, wood stains, enamels in the nature of house paint, lacquers and coatings in the nature of sealers for use in industrial and residential applications, coatings in the nature of automobile finishes, corrosion inhibiting paint type coatings for commercial marine use or for use in the oil and/or gas drilling industry, shellac as an interior surface coating, wood preservatives for fences and other construction purposes, coatings in the nature of tennis racket and fishing rod finishes, and silicone coatings for roofs | ABANDONED | Jan 1, 1997 |
| 019 | asphalt roof coatings | ABANDONED | Jan 1, 1997 |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 21, 1999 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 16, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 12, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 2, 1998 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Oct 14, 1998 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jun 2, 1998 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Mar 10, 1998 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 7, 1998 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Dec 20, 1997 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 4, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 30, 1997 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 14, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 22, 1997 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 6, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 3, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |