USPTO serial 75139984
MICROATMOSPHERE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SNAPP, TINA LOUISE
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with MICROATMOSPHERE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Kathleen M. Petrillo
KATHLEEN M PETRILLO SENNIGER, POWERS, LEAVITT & ROEDELONE METROPOLITAN SQ 16TH FLST LOUIS, MO 63102UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | sustained-release self-sterilizing oxidants for use in the manufacture of deodorizers or biocides which control the growth of microorganisms | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Bernard Technologies, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Bernard Technologies, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by MICROACTIVE CORP.
- Other trademarks in Class 001
- Similar marks named MICROATMOSPHERE
- Prosecution event ABN2 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 3, 2000 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 22, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 13, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 6, 2000 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Dec 17, 1999 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jul 12, 1999 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 14, 1999 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Jan 4, 1999 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 7, 1998 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Oct 15, 1998 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 23, 1998 | PCGR | PETITION TO DIRECTOR GRANTED | — |
| Jul 16, 1998 | PCRC | PETITION TO DIRECTOR RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 5, 1998 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Dec 15, 1997 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 6, 1997 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jun 17, 1997 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Mar 25, 1997 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 21, 1997 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 27, 1997 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 23, 1997 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Dec 16, 1996 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 21, 1996 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 15, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |