USPTO serial 75140151
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Anata Systems International Inc.
Calgary, Alberta T2A 0S8, CA
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Herbert Cohen
HERBERT COHEN WIGMAN, COHEN, LEITNER & MYERS, PCTHE FARRAGUT BLDG STE 100010TH FL 900 17TH ST N WWASHINGTON, DC 20006| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 020 | bedroom furniture, namely, mattresses, beds, dressers, hutches, night tables, armoires, chairs and recliners; living room furniture, namely, sofas, side tables, coffee tables, day beds, hide-a-beds and foot stools; and pillows | ACTIVE | — |
| 024 | home furnishing products, namely, comforters, duvet covers, bed sheets, pillow cases, bed blankets, bed spreads, pillow shams, draperies and fabric valances | ACTIVE | — |
| 028 | exercise equipment, namely, stationary bicycles, treadmills, barbells, exercise weights, rowing machines, stationary ski machines, stair stepping machines and back exercisers | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 25, 2001 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 25, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 17, 2000 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 21, 1999 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 8, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 3, 1999 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Aug 9, 1999 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 9, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 9, 1999 | PRIM | PETITION INQUIRY LETTER MAILED | — |
| Feb 19, 1999 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 8, 1998 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 22, 1997 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 7, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 28, 1997 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 24, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |