USPTO serial 75140244
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Boston, MA
Boston, MA
Marblehead, MA
Boston, MA
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
GLENN A GUNDERSEN
DAVID O JOHANSON ESQ BINGHAM MCCUTCHEN LLP150 FEDERAL STBOSTON, MA 02110UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | counseling in the fields of nutrition, health and fitness | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 22, 2008 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Aug 4, 2008 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Oct 10, 2006 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Oct 1, 2005 | CANT | CANCELLATION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Oct 1, 2005 | CAND | CANCELLATION DENIED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jan 4, 2005 | PETC | CANCELLATION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Dec 29, 2004 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 10, 2001 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Apr 17, 2001 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 4, 2001 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 14, 2001 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Feb 2, 2001 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 1, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 23, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 17, 2001 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jan 17, 2001 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 16, 2000 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Nov 16, 2000 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Jul 24, 2000 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| May 26, 2000 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Jan 10, 2000 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 22, 1999 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jun 16, 1999 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| May 13, 1999 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Dec 18, 1998 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 24, 1998 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| May 26, 1998 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Mar 3, 1998 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 30, 1998 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Dec 4, 1997 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 24, 1997 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Oct 24, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 24, 1997 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 31, 1997 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Feb 3, 1997 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 17, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |