USPTO serial 75141046
MAYER BROS. HONEY BREWED SPECIAL BLEND REBEL PREMIUM DRAFT CIDER
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3033304Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Dec 27, 2005
- Examiner
- GRAY, CAROLYN
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with MAYER BROS. HONEY BREWED SPECIAL BLEND REBEL PREMIUM DRAFT CIDER?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Mayer Bros. Apple Products, Inc.
West Seneca, NY
Mayer Bros. Apple Products, Inc.
West Seneca, NY
Mayer Bros. Apple Products, Inc.
West Seneca, NY
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Peter K. Sommer
PETER K SOMMER PHILLIPS, LYTLE, HITCHCOCK, ET ALINTELLECTUAL PROPERTY GROUP3400 MARINE MIDLAND CTRBUFFALO, NY 14203Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 033 | hard cider | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jul 9, 1996 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Mayer Bros. Apple Products, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Mayer Bros. Apple Products, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Mayer Bros. Apple Products, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 033
- Similar marks named MAYER BROS. HONEY BREWED SPECIAL BLEND REBEL PREMIUM DRAFT CIDER
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 21, 2012 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Dec 27, 2005 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Oct 4, 2005 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 14, 2005 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 20, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 16, 2005 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 15, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Apr 4, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 4, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 9, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 9, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 9, 2005 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Mar 7, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 26, 2005 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 19, 2005 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Sep 13, 2004 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 13, 2004 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 13, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 17, 2004 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 14, 2004 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 13, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 28, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Feb 24, 1997 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 19, 1997 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 7, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 6, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |