USPTO serial 75141766
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
DAVID B NEWMAN JR
DAVID B NEWMAN JR DAVID, NEWMAN & ASSOC PCCENTENNIAL SQP O BOX 2728LAPLATA, MD 20646-2728| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | spread spectrum wireless audio-visual emergency and communication system, comprising wireless radio transceivers, computers with graphical user interface displays, directional antennas, wireless audio speakers, wireless visual displays, namely, LED programmable electronic message boards, wireless radio transmitters, wireless radio receivers, wireless spread spectrum transmitters, wireless spread spectrum receivers, and emergency call-box units | ACTIVE | Feb 1, 1993 |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 15, 2000 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Feb 18, 2000 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Feb 18, 2000 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Sep 15, 1999 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jun 3, 1999 | OPPF | OPPOSITION PAPERS RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| May 11, 1999 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 9, 1999 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 7, 1999 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 27, 1999 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Dec 18, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 22, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 26, 1997 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 27, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 3, 1997 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 22, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |