USPTO serial 75142210
THE INTERNATIONAL WHO'S WHO
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 601
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BLANDU, FLORENTINA
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with THE INTERNATIONAL WHO'S WHO?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jeffrey H. Kaufman
JEFFREY H KAUFMAN OBLON, SPIVAK, MCCLELLAND, MAIER, ET ALFOURTH FL1755 JEFFERSON DAVIS HWYARLINGTON, VA 22202Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 016 | biographical reference books and printed publications, namely, directories, journals, magazines, and leaflets all relating to international personalities | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 30, 2001 | ABN1 | ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED | — |
| Aug 14, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 11, 2000 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 2, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 19, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 24, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 15, 1999 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 24, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 24, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 9, 1998 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 7, 1998 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Dec 9, 1997 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Oct 21, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 21, 1997 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Sep 18, 1997 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 26, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 7, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 7, 1997 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 23, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 23, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 12, 1996 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |