USPTO serial 75143106
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Integrated Manufacturing and Packaging Systems, Inc.
Norcross, GA
Other trademarks owned by Integrated Manufacturing and Packaging Systems, Inc.
Integrated Manufacturing and Packaging Systems, Inc.
Norcross, GA
Other trademarks owned by Integrated Manufacturing and Packaging Systems, Inc.
Integrated Manufacturing and Packaging Systems, Inc.
Norcross, GA
Other trademarks owned by Integrated Manufacturing and Packaging Systems, Inc.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
James B. Middleton
Walter A. Rodgers Rodgers & Rodgers6100 Lake Forrest DriveSuite 340Atlanta, GA 30328| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | industrial design services in the field of equipment for the manufacturing, processing and packaging of foods, beverages, and general consumer products | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 6, 2007 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| May 23, 2007 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 20, 2006 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jan 2, 2001 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Sep 28, 2000 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Aug 7, 2000 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jun 12, 2000 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| May 3, 2000 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| May 3, 2000 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| Apr 7, 2000 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Feb 11, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 10, 1999 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jun 15, 1999 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Mar 23, 1999 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 19, 1999 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Nov 19, 1998 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 21, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 4, 1998 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Mar 17, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 16, 1998 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Jan 23, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 11, 1997 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 16, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 16, 1997 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 7, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |